<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/abc" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>ChicagoGunCase.com</title>
	<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com</link>
	<description>Restoring the Second Amendment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Chicago&#8217;s New Gun Laws</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago’s new ordinance demands careful review, and many questions still need to be answered about its implementation. But some things are readily apparent.
First, Heller and McDonald are valuable not just for the laws they’ll remove from the books, but for the work they do convincing legislators not to bother with certain proposals. For every law [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/07/02/chicagos-new-gun-laws/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>New Chicago Gun Regs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re studying the  new ordinance being proposed in Chicago and I&#8217;ll have more to say about it later.
For now, please note that many of the rumors and early reports about what it contains are not accurate or vague in potentially misleading ways.
From our perspective, we are most interested in learning whether the new law addresses [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/07/01/new-chicago-gun-regs/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>My Overview on SCOTUSBlog</title>
		<description><![CDATA[My under-500 word take on our victory, and what it means for the future of gun litigation.
I&#8217;ll expand on these ideas later&#8230;
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/07/01/my-overview-on-scotusblog/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>McDonald Opinion</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The McDonald Opinion is posted.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/06/28/mcdonald-opinion/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reply Briefs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Our reply brief is right here.
The other reply brief is also posted.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/29/reply-briefs/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Chicago&#8217;s Friends Roll In</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Check the case filings page throughout the day as we post the amici briefs in support of Respondents.
Interesting tidbit: hat trick scored by Albany Prof. Paul Finkelman, appearing as an amicus in three (3) briefs (so far)&#8230;
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/06/chicagos-friends-roll-in/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Chicago Magazine Profile &#8212; Better Link</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
Some folks have had difficulty using the earlier linked widget for the Chicago Magazine profile on our case.
The magazine now has a normal, easy to read version here.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/chicago-magazine-profile-better-link/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Brief for Chicago and Oak Park</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Right here.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/brief-for-chicago-and-oak-park/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Chicago Magazine Profile</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago Magazine covers the McDonald case.  Read all about it.
And here&#8217;s an NPR interview with the article&#8217;s author.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/22/chicago-magazine-profile/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Holiday Housekeeping</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Three quick items:
1. The Court has granted the American Legislative Exchange Council&#8217;s motion to file an amicus brief on our side. ALEC had given only two days notice of their amicus brief, and Chicago did not consent to the late filing, but neither did the Respondents file an opposition to that motion.  The brief is [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/17/holiday-housekeeping/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
