<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChicagoGunCase.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chicagoguncase.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com</link>
	<description>Restoring the Second Amendment</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Reply Briefs</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/29/reply-briefs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/29/reply-briefs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our reply brief is right here.
The other reply brief is also posted.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/29/reply-briefs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago&#8217;s Friends Roll In</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/06/chicagos-friends-roll-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/06/chicagos-friends-roll-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check the case filings page throughout the day as we post the amici briefs in support of Respondents.
Interesting tidbit: hat trick scored by Albany Prof. Paul Finkelman, appearing as an amicus in three (3) briefs (so far)&#8230;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2010/01/06/chicagos-friends-roll-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Magazine Profile &#8212; Better Link</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/chicago-magazine-profile-better-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/chicago-magazine-profile-better-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Some folks have had difficulty using the earlier linked widget for the Chicago Magazine profile on our case.
The magazine now has a normal, easy to read version here.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/chicago-magazine-profile-better-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brief for Chicago and Oak Park</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/brief-for-chicago-and-oak-park/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/brief-for-chicago-and-oak-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right here.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/30/brief-for-chicago-and-oak-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Magazine Profile</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/22/chicago-magazine-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/22/chicago-magazine-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago Magazine covers the McDonald case.  Read all about it.
And here&#8217;s an NPR interview with the article&#8217;s author.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/22/chicago-magazine-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holiday Housekeeping</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/17/holiday-housekeeping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/17/holiday-housekeeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three quick items:
1. The Court has granted the American Legislative Exchange Council&#8217;s motion to file an amicus brief on our side. ALEC had given only two days notice of their amicus brief, and Chicago did not consent to the late filing, but neither did the Respondents file an opposition to that motion.  The brief is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/17/holiday-housekeeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason Chimes In</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/02/reason-chimes-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/02/reason-chimes-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Doherty at Reason Online offers a look at some of the controversy surrounding our &#8220;radical&#8221; desire to have the Court enforce the actual text of the Constitution as it was popularly understood by the people who ratified it.
Note that these dissenting voices are not really claiming that our position is wrong. They just aren&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/12/02/reason-chimes-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argument Date: March 2, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/30/argument-date-march-2-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/30/argument-date-march-2-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case will be argued Tuesday, March 2, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/30/argument-date-march-2-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing the Amici</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/reviewing-the-amici/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/reviewing-the-amici/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s impossible to summarize all the amicus briefs that have been filed in support of our position, but we wanted to point out at least a few that appear to be significantly helpful or illuminating. It’s not an exhaustive list, and we may revisit this topic in the future. Please note: We’ve worked hard to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/reviewing-the-amici/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We get questions&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/we-get-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/we-get-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Gura</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicagoguncase.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We understand that not everyone will agree with our position in this case. For example, we expect that Chicago’s attorneys will present some alternative constitutional vision that supports their desired outcome. May the more persuasive argument (ours, I should hope) prevail.
But not everyone agrees that the case should or would be based upon the Supreme [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chicagoguncase.com/2009/11/29/we-get-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
